|
|
Post by crimsonsphere1 on May 4, 2015 14:00:31 GMT
Werewolves dont prove vampires exist because they dont either. In the same way vampires are just legends of Supers like Vlad twisted by peoples imagination, werewolves are just Supers having a bad hair day.
|
|
|
|
Post by heartmaiden on May 4, 2015 14:29:59 GMT
...but what if werewolves existed that weren't Supers?
|
|
|
|
Post by enviro1st on May 4, 2015 15:34:50 GMT
Technically by their existence they would be a meta-human, which is just another way of saying super but with less capes and heroism all round...
|
|
|
|
Post by heartmaiden on May 5, 2015 14:18:25 GMT
What about a were-human? Like a werewolf only it's a wolf that turns human in the full moon - is that a superwolf or a superhuman?
|
|
|
|
Post by undrwhelmingquestion on May 6, 2015 0:07:42 GMT
Ye gods, I leave this forum for two days, and already we're asking the hard-hitting philosophical questions. I'm gonna pin my colours to 'super wolf', though, for what it's worth. One awkward anthropomorphic phase per month does not genuine homo sapiens make.
|
|
